Yesterday was pretty uneventful from the evening up, until there was HIC which I got lost* but I finally found my way after asking directions only once (and stalking some other guy who appeared to be going to HIC as well, until I realised he was lost himself, then I ran ahead. Thankfully a Hwachong guy in tight khaki shorts scampered ahead and led me to the entrance of the Drama Centre.
[*I WILL ALWAYS GET LOST IN THE BOWELS OF HWACHONG, IT IS A CURSE, SYMPATHY NOT REQUIRED. No, seriously, what an ill-mannered school. In MY school they have assorted student leaders standing every five meters holding large yellow neon signs with arrows pointing to the event of function.]
I missed the first part of The Biting Point but I’d heard so much about it anyway – series of vignettes involving taxi drivers. It’s a very interesting concept to have this enormous cast in different unrelated but seemingly converging stories, and the world of taxi drivers was always going to be an interesting one. To be fair I thought they were the best play of the five, but that wasn’t saying much. Aside from the interesting “twist” at the end of Akilan’s Bus Stop (the theme of HIC 2008 might as well be “Transport and Weirdly Unrelated But Somehow Tied-Together-In-A-Stark-Resolution Dialogues and Anecdotes”), I felt that the attempt at rhyming verse was a big mistake, it reduced their play to contrived half-rhymes and convoluted sentence structures – though in the teacher scene the rhyme produced one comic moment.
The other plays were bad, nuff said – though I totally missed the first one which lasted maybe ten minutes. Even the last one by the “Drama Club” was pretty bad, a major implausibility in the court scene and the most entertaining thing in the play was a runty squeaky-voiced guy who if his character had a pet gerbil should be better off playing that instead.
The Biting Point won Best Play, obviously, great fanbase and in any case like Souffle last year was a class above the other HIC plays, but to be honest I felt that the idea of segmenting a play into many different unrelated parts was unwise, even if revolutionary at this level of theatre. We had scenes going on for a minute or two before the lights went off, and then totally new sets of characters came in, relating their experiences and encounters. If I understand the play correctly it is all about achieving empathy for taxi drivers, yet the very fact that these drivers went on and off every now and then prevented the audience from empathising with them at all. It would really have been much wiser to stick to a main driver, possibly, and have the other stories revolve around him in a sense, but in a play where the main character was hard to define the intended catharsis (if any? I’m guessing that the way the play ended was directed at some sort of empathy for drivers) at the end kinda fell flat.
On a sidenote I haven’t been on stage for three whole months! *CLAWS AT SELF FOR LACK OF ATTENTION*
REACTIONZ